Human nature as a struggle between reason and desire Essay

Human nature as a debate between argue and desire - Essay ExamplePictures and images are suitable to those only who lack to a greater extent sophisticated expressions (Falzon 3). Plato has stated in Platos Cave that when inside the cave, shadows on the wall are taken as real by persons not enlightened but the truth is that one need to come place in the sunlight to see reality.This prejudice against visual images is further enhanced in cinema. Since there excessively we sit in the dark hall and see images moving in front of us. Le Doeuff (1989 as cited in Falzon 4) stated that images are illustrative which enter deep and help form our thoughts.. Still almost may argue that let films be just films. Why distort or bend these to stand for into some philosophical definitions The answer to this may be, using films to interpret philosophy is just one more perspective to looking at these. One may argue that films are prejudiced in having the makers absorb and thus may influence our i nterpretations. Certainly, but you can use the film as a miserly to think of presenting the story in different way or find what the maker has left out. We mark longer what we have seen and that continuously constructs our thinking till our reasons satisfy the outcome. In the movie Cape dismay (Scorsese 1991), Max Cady is a vicious redneck who has just served a 14-year prison sentence for a lair incident of rape and battery. Now, hes arrived to seek vengeance on surface-to-air missile Bowden, the lawyer who defended him but was so repulsed by his clients crime that he buried a crucial piece of evidence. The last mentioned could have reduced gracelessness of Cadys punishment. Scorsese and De Niro are taking the sort of brutish, menacing, perversely unreasonable criminal as a phantom. If there, truly, is such a character in our life then this absolutely self-destructive person presents conflict between mania and reason. Cady begins to practice a sleek form of cat-and-mouse terror ism, and without really stepping outside the law harasses Bowdens. Whats more, He feels strongly that Sam, by failing to defend him to the best of his abilities and overly stepping outside the law, alsok it into his own hands.Cady emphasises that, now, he no longer has the redress to expect that same law to protect him. Cady seems to have a good reason for his act. He is also trying to save Bowdens from their sins by punishing them. How does philosophy explain the conduct of Cady and Sam The latter has dozens of infidelities as well and thus shows weaknesses in his personality. Was Sam right in deciding that Cadys crime is too repulsive to be allowed any respite And was Cady right in being obsessed with the revenge against Sams whole family Our reasons, feelings, thought and behaviour are controlled by different parts of minds. Both Freud and Kant consider mind as divided entity rather than a single unit. While hiding the report that could have reduced Cadys punishment, Sam was in conflict between reason and passion (to do lawyers duty well for his client), finally the reason yielded to passion that a criminal of Cadys level should be given severe punishment. It is also possible that during the fertilise of our life, we develop many unconscious thoughts and wishes that keep on influencing our conscious decisions (Critchley et al 169). Similarly the overemphasised view of the disgrace of Sam, by Cady is due both to breach of trust as well as the conflicts of passion and reason. When the latter two were in harmony, he succeeded in creating fear in Bowdens family. But when these two were in conflict, he lost his own life.